- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:45:20 +0100
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Am 05.02.2021 um 10:00 schrieb Greg Wilkins: > > > On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 09:41, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de > <mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de>> wrote: > > > Note: "Etag" is already marked as acceptable in trailers > (<https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/262 > <https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/262>>). > > > Sure, but one of the suggestions to come out of this thread is that it > might be valuable to put something in the header to say that the final > value will be in the trailers. This could be for an individual header > (eg Willy suggested Cache-Control: no-cache; trailers) or a more > general mechanism like the 3xx proposal. > ... For fields that are *only* available as trailer, we have the Trailer response header field...: Trailer: ETag Now do we beed a generic solution for saying "I have this field as header field, but I want the trailer field to override it"? Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 5 February 2021 09:45:39 UTC