- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 17:58:29 +0100
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Am 02.02.2021 um 17:34 schrieb Poul-Henning Kamp: > -------- > Julian Reschke writes: >> Am 02.02.2021 um 15:31 schrieb Poul-Henning Kamp: >>> -------- >>> Julian Reschke writes: >>>> Am 02.02.2021 um 14:09 schrieb Poul-Henning Kamp: >>>>> Have we thought about how future incompatible changes to -semantics wi= >> ll be versioned? >>>>> ... >>>> >>>> Have we *ever* done a change to the "semantics" part of HTTP in the pas= >> t? >>> >>> "PUSH" did ? >>> >>> It went 180 degrees counter to the "request-response" model we had >>> and which we still espouse in the -semantic draft. >> >> I would call that an extension of HTTP semantics, not an incompatible change. > > Call it what you will, it disproves that the semantic layer has been forever cast in stone[1]. > > Personally I think the most sensible thing to do is to make it the job of the messaging layer (or lower) to negotiate it, and simply noting that expectation, *should* it ever happen, works for me. > > Issuing a standard without even having thought about revisions would be standardization malpractice IMO. Do you have a concrete proposal what to do? Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2021 16:58:46 UTC