Re: June Interim: call for topics

Hi Meiling,

Based on the previous list discussion, this sounds like it would best be handled as an issue on the ongoing revision of the HTTP/2 spec.

Can you please file an issue to discuss the problem statement here?

https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/issues <https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/issues>

Best,
Tommy

> On May 21, 2021, at 12:38 AM, Meiling Chen <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> If time permits, I'd like to add one for the topic of  http2 window size setting, 15 minutes is ok.
> 
> We describe it in detail in the draft draft-chen-httpbis-window-size-use-case-00(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-httpbis-window-size-use-case/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-httpbis-window-size-use-case/>).
> Meanwhile,  we proposed a solution to the problem, by define the minimum value setting mechanism of HTTP2.0 Window and Window_update, and a Window_update frame sending
> mechanism. We describe interactive <> process <> in detail in the draft draft-chen-httpbis-window-size-00 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-httpbis-window-size/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-httpbis-window-size/>) .
>  
> From: Mark Nottingham <mailto:mnot@mnot.net>
> Date: 2021-05-20 12:23
> To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> CC: Tommy Pauly <mailto:tpauly@apple.com>
> Subject: June Interim: call for topics
> Hi everyone,
>  
> We've roughed in an agenda for the upcoming agenda here:
>   https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/interim-21-06/agenda.html
>  
> If you have a topic you think would benefit from WG discussion, please say so. We prefer topics to be discussed on-list before we devote meeting time to them, so if you haven't already done so, please start a mailing list discussion thread first.
>  
> Cheers,
>  
>  
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/