- From: Roberto Polli <roberto@teamdigitale.governo.it>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 10:57:59 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Il giorno gio 3 set 2020 alle ore 09:11 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> ha scritto: > > ... draft-snell-search-method-02.txt .. > > What do people think about it -- is it worthwhile? Are there any problems? Consider this a prelude to a CfA... > The draft currently is minimal in that it re-uses an existing method, > making it more generic (which seems to be good in general). 1- I like the general idea; 2- such a feature is useful; 3- implying that an xml payload must return a webdav response can limit its adoption or foster non-compliant implementation (Eg. xml requests returning non-webdav responses). This will happen unless we revise https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5323, which is widely deployed. While I'm no fan of xml, this is quite a limitation. ``` for backwards compatibility with existing WebDAV implementations, SEARCH requests that use the text/xml or application/xml content types MUST be processed per the requirements established by [RFC5323]. ``` If somebody prefer to use an alternative method name, we could pick QUERY or FIND https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Proposal_for_HTTP_QUERY_Verb Once we agree on the semantics, the name can be anything. My2¢, R. -- Roberto Polli Full Stack Developer M. +39 3406522736 MID DIPARTIMENTO PER LA TRASFORMAZIONE DIGITALE Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri - Ministro per l'innovazione tecnologica e la digitalizzazione teamdigitale.governo.it Il Dipartimento per la Trasformazione Digitale, salvo eccezioni, comunica con le altre Amministrazioni via posta elettronica ordinaria e non posta elettronica certificata, in conformità a quanto previsto dall’art.47 del Codice dell’Amministrazione Digitale.
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2020 08:58:24 UTC