Re: Time to refresh HTTP/2?

On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 08:18, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
>
> All this tiresome talk about terminology got me thinking about the value of action over words.
>
> So, I present to you a proposed update to RFC 7540:
>
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00
>
> This only does:
>
> * removes unnecessarily divisive terminology
> * rolls up errata
>
> Obviously, there is a long and slippery slope of things that we might do from this point.  However, I think that it would be good if we could just publish a minimal update without getting embroiled in difficult and time-consuming design questions.

I'm +1 on this as well. I'd like to see the extensions rolled in,
along with GREASE. I'm a bit more nervous about the priority changes
given how relatively young they are.

Received on Friday, 28 August 2020 14:54:27 UTC