- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:40:09 +1100
- To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, tpauly@apple.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Fair enough. > On 29 Jan 2020, at 5:39 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 23.01.2020 23:29, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Hi Rick, >> >> I'm saying that those documents are actively under revision now, so the appropriate place to discuss it is in that effort, not as an erratum against the soon-to-be-obsoleted specification. >> >> Cheers, > > Yes. > > But we have to deal with the erratum in any case. I believe that what > RFC 7230 says is intentional, so within the scope of the erratum we > should deal with adjusting the prose referring to RFC 3986. Thus "Held > For Update". > > Best regards, Julian -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2020 06:40:22 UTC