W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2020

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5964)

From: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:16:12 +0100
Message-ID: <5E31AFCC.1030502@openfortress.nl>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, tpauly@apple.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org

This works for me, and sounds proper -- it formally transfers the work
to the newly posted issue on GitHub.


> But we have to deal with the erratum in any case. I believe that what
> RFC 7230 says is intentional, so within the scope of the erratum we
> should deal with adjusting the prose referring to RFC 3986. Thus "Held
> For Update".
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2020 16:18:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 29 January 2020 16:18:02 UTC