- From: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:45:28 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Alex Martinez <amartine@redhat.com>
Hi Mark, Il giorno mar 19 nov 2019 alle ore 08:43 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> ha scritto: > [..] this draft [..is..] not an official WG item yet, so we won't call a meeting about it yet. I didn't expect the board to call an official meeting, as I understand the IETF agenda is quite busy :) Just to keep in touch with the interested people: I'll try better to be on-site for the next events. Thanks for your hard work in chairing the workgroup: I understand it's not an easy task. Regards, R. > > On 19 Nov 2019, at 3:37 pm, Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi @all > > > > and thank you for all the feedback provided during yesterday's presentation! > > > > https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tDBzMZ81iDXmGjQR2yaxuQ5-W03Xeerllkr_9PYsOtw/edit#slide=id.p > > > > It would be great to organise a remote meeting to push forward the > > spec (we're in CET timezone though). > > > > Some points: > > > > - support scope > > https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers/issues/70 > > - support for structured headers (help wanted > > https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers/issues/35) > > - relationship with proxies and security considerations > > - improve FAQ (eg. why github ratelimit model is not enough and > > contributes to header proliferation) > > https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers/blame/master/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers.md#L1011 > > > > > > Thanks again to everyone, > > Roberto > > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ >
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2019 08:45:45 UTC