On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 11:59 PM Philipp Junghannß <teamhydro55555@gmail.com> wrote: > delay in whatever time unit needed is a good Idea, totally agree. > compatible to basically anything without needing to care for DST, leap > days/seconds or whatever, just a stupidly simple second counter. > And it needs to be a float type (32-bit) to support sub-second intervals. (also my earlier question on "Prefer: timeout= ...." ... ) > Am Mo., 5. Aug. 2019 um 14:06 Uhr schrieb Amos Jeffries < > squid3@treenet.co.nz>: > >> On 5/08/19 10:38 pm, Roberto Polli wrote: >> > Hi @all, >> > >> > While reading the Retry-After specs I was guessing... >> > >> > if we had to reboot the retry-after header, would we use the HTTP-date >> > or the unix-timestamp syntax? >> >> >> Why re-design it at all? >> >> If anything reduce it to just the delay-seconds field value. That is >> compatible with any time locale. >> >> Amos >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2019 18:52:19 UTC