- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:46:14 +0000
- To: Sebastiaan Deckers <sebdeckers83@gmail.com>
- cc: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <CADVGGb-7DQvBz2SUxeG7aH6dntO2p1bv2h0sEMDiHw1RrMJ6zQ@mail.gmail.com>, Sebastiaan Deckers writes: >--00000000000033d3d20583e27557 >Is there a popularity cutoff % at which point we can break the web? As >stated, Refresh has 23+ years of real world use. Even ~1/5000 responses >(from a tiny 52M sample) is a huge amount on the scale of the web. ... or it may just be a handful of sites which need to pull their act together ? I don't think this kind of stuff should be measured in requests, it should be measured in origins. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2019 09:46:43 UTC