On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, 08:47 Patrick Meenan <patmeenan@gmail.com > > My proposal explicitly allowed for that with the "no cuncurrency" groups > which transfer resources sequentially by stream ID using 100% of the > bandwidth. The ordering is based on the order requested (which is normally > the order they are in the document as discovered by the parser) and if > something needs to jump ahead it can be given a higher priority bin. > With H3 we need to be slightly careful, IMO requests will be handled in the order of (received + QPACK dependencies resolved). The removal of exclusive is a logical concession. Current priority language allows for PRIORITY to be sent before the HEADERS on a request stream. This alleviates some client concerns but not all. The number of placeholders is a QUIC varint. The number of requests in a connection is limited by stream ID ( varint modulo 4). It might be possible to implement a Dmitri's tree design bit whether is logical is a different question... Lucas >> >> > >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:07:48 UTC