W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2019

Re: Cache Digests status

From: Loïc Hoguin <essen@ninenines.eu>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:28:04 +0100
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>
Message-ID: <f6813977-1d7a-ebed-f5ee-26be26d71ea8@ninenines.eu>
Thanks for the notice.

This draft seemed like a good solution to optimize PUSH and I was 
looking forward to it (mostly for server/API/mobile clients). Are there 
any plans for an alternative?

Thanks,

On 14/01/2019 07:29, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> After discussion with the editors, the chairs believe that it isn't likely that this draft will be implemented widely enough to justify standardisation - even as Experimental - in the foreseeable future.
> 
> Therefore, we intend to move it to the "dead" state (as described in <https://datatracker.ietf.org/help/state/draft/ietf>).
> 
> Note that if sentiment changes, the draft *can* be "resurrected." If we've misread the signals and there are people intending to implement (especially on the browser side, as that's the primary use case it's designed for), please bring that to our attention.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 

-- 
Loïc Hoguin
https://ninenines.eu
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2019 09:10:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 24 January 2019 09:10:05 UTC