- From: Thomas Peterson <hidinginthebbc@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:48:31 +0000
- To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: httpbis-chairs@ietf.org
Received on Monday, 14 January 2019 09:48:55 UTC
I too am also in favour of adopting, and despite my initial concerns not being completely addressed with any update to the document (see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2018JulSep/0314.html), I don't believe these should block it moving forward. Regards On 13/01/2019 20:19, Tommy Pauly wrote: > Hello HTTPBis, > > In Bangkok, we had a presentation from Mark on a draft to define a > standard Cache HTTP Response Header, that can be used to replace > non-standard uses of the "X-Cache" header. The document can be found > here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-cache-header-00. > > The response in the room was favorable to having the group work on > this header, but we didn't have time (and hadn't had sufficient > discussion) to do a formal call for adoption. > > This email starts a request for feedback, and a call for adoption. > Please reply to this email with your thoughts, and state whether or > not you believe the group should adopt this document. Feedback is > requested by *Friday, January 25th*. > > Best, > Tommy
Received on Monday, 14 January 2019 09:48:55 UTC