W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2019

Re: [Anima] Content-Transfer-Encoding and HTTP 1.x in ANIMA BRSKI

From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:20:12 +0200
Message-Id: <AD4DC1AA-C332-4BC7-B095-0CDD30700B99@cisco.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, draft-ietf-pkix-est@ietf.org, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>, "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
I am looking at libest and it certainly generates the header.

> On 13 Jun 2019, at 08:27, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> On Jun 12, 2019, at 19:26, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> 2) Assuming the answer to (1) is no, what should we make of RFC7030
>>>   that says to use it, and to base64 binary objects?
>> 
>> Raise an erratum :-).
> 
> Not sure about the smiley here.  This is an erratum.
> Now how to resolve this depends on what option causes the smallest damage.
> 
> RFC 7030 is supposed to be a widely deployed protocol, so it should not be hard to find out what people out there are actually doing.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima


Received on Thursday, 13 June 2019 11:20:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:15:34 UTC