W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2019

Re: [Anima] Content-Transfer-Encoding and HTTP 1.x in ANIMA BRSKI

From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:27:55 +0200
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, anima@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, draft-ietf-pkix-est@ietf.org
Message-Id: <F896BCBC-6C32-4107-B4B5-C12617F81326@tzi.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
On Jun 12, 2019, at 19:26, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> 2) Assuming the answer to (1) is no, what should we make of RFC7030
>>    that says to use it, and to base64 binary objects?
> Raise an erratum :-).

Not sure about the smiley here.  This is an erratum.
Now how to resolve this depends on what option causes the smallest damage.

RFC 7030 is supposed to be a widely deployed protocol, so it should not be hard to find out what people out there are actually doing.

Grüße, Carsten
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2019 06:28:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:15:34 UTC