- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:22:59 +0700
- To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Ori Finkelman <orif@qwilt.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, ggie@ietf.org, "Begen, Ali (Contractor)" <Ali_Begen@comcast.com>
My .02 - I was thinking that at most, we'd look at adding a bit of text to 3xx to make it clear that a redirected request is a genuinely new request, and therefore has its own base URL, etc. The fact that some clients follow them automatically is immaterial. Cheers, > On 4 Nov 2018, at 10:14 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 2018-11-04 12:45, Ori Finkelman wrote: >> If that is the case, then we should seek a way to communicate that to the industry as we see many cases of misinterpretations. >> ... > > Assuming the WG agrees with my interpretation, I would recommend to simply update the internet draft with these conclusions and to point anybody who disagrees to that document. > > Best regards, Julian > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 5 November 2018 10:23:30 UTC