- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:23:02 +1100
- To: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
WFM, although we should include the section in 7231 for convenience. > On 11 Oct 2018, at 11:18 am, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 10, 2018, at 4:06 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >> >> In <https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/93>, we noticed that while RFC7231 talks about deprecating the Content-MD5 header, the change didn't make its way into the registry, causing some amount of confusion. >> >> Is there any objection in the working group to asking IANA* to update the Permanent Message Header registry with: >> >> Header name: Content-MD5 >> Protocol: http >> Status: obsoleted >> Reference: RFC7231, Appendix B > > Hmm, I think it should be > > Reference: RFC2616 (obsoleted by RFC7231) > > to be consistent with the Status. > > +1 > > ....Roy > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2018 00:23:30 UTC