- From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 12:45:52 -0700
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live@ietf.org, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, mcmanus@ducksong.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the well-written document! In line with Adam and Ekr's comments, it is perhaps plausible to RECOMMEND a concrete Very Large Value (of 2**53-1 or such) while discussing the cases in which other values would be needed. I agree with Ekr that discussing what happens if you guess wrong and use a too-small value is important, but it also seems that understanding how likely that is to happen can be considered part of the Experiment.
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2018 19:46:15 UTC