- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 18:21:57 +1200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 15/07/18 04:28, Mark Nottingham wrote: > FYI. Has anyone reviewed this from an HTTP perspective? > I have done some irregular reviews vis-a-vis the RFC 723x and 7541 requirements, and loosely following the Unbearable WG discussions. There are some necessary ambiguities since HTTP has a number of use-cases which are incompatible with bound tokens. But overall implementations compliant with HTTP should handle messages containing bound tokens safely, and binding implementations compliant with that document should be sane HTTP participants. AYJ
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2018 06:22:29 UTC