- From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 12:36:00 -0700
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-h2-websockets@ietf.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, mnot@mnot.net, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-h2-websockets-06: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-h2-websockets/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Just a couple of minor comments: Substantive: §5: Is the scheme pseudo-header expected to match the security status of the existing connection? Editorial: §4, first bullet: This sort of deep link into the IANA registries makes it hard for them to evolve their registry organization over time. Please consider referencing the registry by name.
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2018 19:36:27 UTC