W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2018

Re: Working Group Last Call: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/2

From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 23:17:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNoO3-QpW_kO7DXC-byYAcMMvcFBYFBs6zEwV4k8JSHEuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
wfm thanks

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> On 3 May 2018, at 6:52 am, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote:
> >
> >       • Section 5 “replaces the GET based request in [RFC6455]” and
> makes other modifications to the requirements contained therein. This seems
> to suggest that it updates RFC6455 as well.
> > I'm not entirely sure if it updates 6455 or just sort of incorporates
> 6455 into a whole new use case, but in any event its useful reading for
> consumers of 6455 so I agree we should add that meta data. I am curious
> about Mark and/or Alexey's take on this too.
>
> It's a good question; this is a fuzzy area.
>
> I'm happy to just point out the possibility in the Shepherd's Writeup and
> let the IESG figure it out, since it's almost certain to be debated there
> no matter what we do here. Does that work for everyone?
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2018 23:18:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:15:20 UTC