- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 22:17:14 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 07:46:18PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: > I think that's a reasonable argument; since the intended use triggers > automated behaviour, we want to be conservative as possible. Thank you :-) > Next time we have a more informational 4xx proposed, 418 should be the > strongly preferred option, right? I'm fine with this. > Cheers, > > P.S. I'm doing some work to eradicate 418 from existing implementations. :) Great! It must first disappear from all docs all over the net :-/ Willy
Received on Sunday, 6 August 2017 20:17:41 UTC