- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 12:47:27 +0200
- To: Wenbo Zhu <wenboz@google.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>, Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>, Kenji Baheux <kenjibaheux@google.com>
On 2017-06-16 23:33, Wenbo Zhu wrote: > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cice> Actually: RFC 7694 (https://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7694.html) > I am planning to start to advise A-E with 415 responses. Awesome! > Questions to the working group: > > 1. Does CICE alone address the concern to support/enable request > compression in U-A? That was the intent of the spec. > 2. I suspect the success rate of non-negotiated use of (gzip) request > compression will be very high over Internet, esp. if the server > end-point is managed by the content author. Any suggestion otherwise? We've been using gzip-encoded request bodies for ages in WebDAV - just not in browsers. > 3. Any known deployment of gzip/brotli compression in browsers? Might be of interest: <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1221461> (cc: Patrick :-). Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 25 June 2017 10:48:06 UTC