- From: Grahame Grieve <grahame@healthintersections.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:53:54 +1000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAG47hGajGpkrnhTQKFpMSqGNG=z98pV+EqJp4nyV8pzDwfMz9Q@mail.gmail.com>
hi Mark thanks. I'll work harder on getting the irony tone correct; in fact, those questions themselves are not-stupid; it's the answers that usually are :-( I've read that draft, but it doesn't seem to have any traction? Grahame On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Hi Grahame, > > You might want to have a look at: > http://httpwg.org/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis- > encryption-encoding.html > ... along with the implementation list at: > https://github.com/httpwg/wiki/wiki/EncryptedContentEncoding > > Cheers, > > P.S. Anticipating people's questions as "stupid" doesn't help the level of > discourse here. Please refrain from doing so. Thanks. > > > > > On 11 Apr 2017, at 6:53 am, Grahame Grieve <grahame@healthintersections. > com.au> wrote: > > > > We are getting strong push-back against the use of RESTful APis in > healthcare, particularly in Europe, because there is no support for partial > encryption - that is, where the content is encrypted (and signed) but the > headers are not. SSL does both, obviously. (note: this is in b2b context). > > > > There are some RFCs floating around for encrypting and signing the http > body, instead of (or as well as) using SSL - but these don't seem to have > any penetration. > > > > So I'm increasingly seeing discussion around tunneling RESTful APIs > across SOAP (pr higher level profiles on soap like ebMS), purely for the > reason that they protect the body but not the headers. > > > > I'm interested in whether anyone here can give me a sense of perspective > on where we are - why is content encryption not flying like transport > encryption? > > > > And don't ask stupid questions like, how actually useful are the > headers? This discussion isn't really about functionality but about the > ability of large government backbone administrators to tick the box that > they'll have the control they need, while being able to tick the box that > they've protected the patient's privacy and the healthcare provider's need > for reliability > > > > Grahame > > > > > > -- > > ----- > > http://www.healthintersections.com.au / grahame@healthintersections. > com.au / +61 411 867 065 > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > -- ----- http://www.healthintersections.com.au / grahame@healthintersections.com.au / +61 411 867 065
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2017 00:54:27 UTC