- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 08:00:03 +0200
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 03:21:57PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > CL is present only for message framing and can be removed at any hop. > > CL:0 versus no CL has no semantic distinction whatsoever, so any recipient > > that chooses to interpret it as a distinction is inherently broken. > > And the purpose of 411 is to say that Transfer-Encoding chunked isn't useful > because the resource requires a fixed length before it can be invoked (CGI). OK, thanks for this clarification Roy! Willy
Received on Friday, 16 September 2016 06:00:41 UTC