On 15 August 2016 at 11:14, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 15 August 2016 at 07:15, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com> wrote: > > OTOH let me note that a server can also send priority information as > > part of a PUSH_PROMISE frame. This way, the priority tree does not get > > ruined. > > I don't think that makes sense. If the client processes the > PUSH_PROMISE and immediately reprioritizes the push, then the PRIORITY > frame that appears afterwards will be exactly as meaningless or > destructive as anything else. > > I think the key here is "part of"... unlike HEADERS, PUSH_PROMISE doesn't have priority fields. If it did, this would be true. I'm still not sure what it would mean, though. Cheers -- Matthew Kerwin http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
Received on Monday, 15 August 2016 02:08:05 UTC