Re: Experiences with HTTP/2 server push

On 15 August 2016 at 11:14, Martin Thomson <> wrote:

> On 15 August 2016 at 07:15, Kazuho Oku <> wrote:
> > OTOH let me note that a server can also send priority information as
> > part of a PUSH_PROMISE frame. This way, the priority tree does not get
> > ruined.
> I don't think that makes sense.  If the client processes the
> PUSH_PROMISE and immediately reprioritizes the push, then the PRIORITY
> frame that appears afterwards will be exactly as meaningless or
> destructive as anything else.
‚ÄčI think the key here is "part of"... unlike HEADERS, PUSH_PROMISE doesn't
have priority fields. If it did, this would be true. I'm still not sure
what it would mean, though.

  Matthew Kerwin

Received on Monday, 15 August 2016 02:08:05 UTC