- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 13:23:58 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <E7A018F8-A07A-4142-814F-61BB42B553CE@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham writes: >Keep in mind that we're not going to require new headers to use this >thing; if their needs aren't met, they can do something else. > >Looking at recently minted headers, I'm still sharing Martin's >inclination to keep it simple and flat. I fully agree, big fan of KISS here. I just prefer the limitations be located in the per-header schema, rather than in the data format itself. Either way, as long as we paint ourselves into a corner which makes it impossible to have more levels later, I'm fine with only "releasing" one level initially. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2016 13:24:33 UTC