Re: If not JSON, what then ?

In message <>, Mark Nottingham writes:

>Keep in mind that we're not going to require new headers to use this 
>thing; if their needs aren't met, they can do something else.
>Looking at recently minted headers, I'm still sharing Martin's 
>inclination to keep it simple and flat.

I fully agree, big fan of KISS here.

I just prefer the limitations be located in the per-header schema,
rather than in the data format itself.

Either way, as long as we paint ourselves into a corner which makes
it impossible to have more levels later, I'm fine with only
"releasing" one level initially.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2016 13:24:33 UTC