- From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:26:39 -0600
- To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
On 07/27/2016 03:37 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2016-07-27 22:56, Adrien de Croy wrote: >> maybe need something like >> >> Vary: Request-Body > I'd say this is implied anyway. RFC 7231 appears to imply the opposite: It explicitly allows GET requests with bodies while not placing any request-body-related restrictions on their response cachability and sharing AFAICT. Similarly, there are instructions for caching POST responses that do not mention request body importance (and nearly implying its irrelevance by mentioning GET hits for POST-cached responses). Alex.
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2016 23:27:20 UTC