Re: JSON headers - No: CBOR headers

On 13 July 2016 at 10:57, Carsten Bormann <> wrote:
> Consistent overhead byte stuffing (COBS)?  (Just brainstorming.  Don’t know
> how important consistent overhead is here.)

I wouldn't bother with COBS, I would just negotiate or signal the use
of a new encoding, and say that that comes with no attached meaning
for 0x0.  I think that also fits neatly with PHK's desire to remove
multiple instances of the same header field.

Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2016 02:42:44 UTC