Re: JSON headers

On 2016-07-10 11:09, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> --------
> In message <>, Julian Reschke
>  writes:
>> On 2016-07-10 10:04, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> FWIW, duplicate headers aren't really needed, when the header field was
>>>> defined properly (so the only problem is Set-Cookie, see
>>>> <>).
>>> I'll second the call for a blanket ban on repeat headers if they
>>> use the new (JSON-)syntax.
>>> ...
>> But that's not what I said.
> No, that is what Phil asked for:
>> It would be nice if the JSON encoding handled arrays so that the demand for
>> duplicate headers is removed.  Signing could then be more successful and could
>> even stipulate that the presence of a repeat header in a signed request is a
>> failure condition.
> I would go as far to make all repeat header a failure condition under the
> new format.

I'm not sure how that would be helpful, nor how that would be legal wrt 
the base spec.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Sunday, 10 July 2016 09:36:25 UTC