- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 18:00:47 +1000
- To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, nekt@nekt.ru, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Sounds like REJECTED, then. > On 6 Jul 2016, at 9:04 PM, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > > On 2016/07/06 19:52, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 06.07.2016 12:48, RFC Errata System wrote: >>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7231, >>> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content". >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> You may review the report below and at: >>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7231&eid=4734 > >>> Corrected Text >>> -------------- > >>> Accept-Language = 1#( language-range [ weight ] ) >>> language-range = >>> <language-range, see [RFC5646], Section 2.1> > >>> Accept-Language: da, en-GB;q=0.8, en;q=0.7 >>> >>> would mean: "I prefer Danish, but will accept British English and >>> other types of English". >>> >>> Notes >>> ----- >>> RFC4647 -> RFC5646 >>> en-gb -> en-GB >>> ... >> >> As far as I can tell, language-range is defined in RFC 4647, not in RFC >> 5646. So the change as proposed seems to be incorrect. > > Yes indeed, see e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47. > > The other change, from 'en-gb' to 'en-GB', may be seen as a tiny stylistic improvement (because the 'canonical' way to write country codes in language tags is upper case), but is not at all required (because language tags are case-insensitive). > > Regards, Martin. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2016 08:01:24 UTC