- From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:54:55 +0000
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, mnot@pobox.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Joel Jaeggli has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I think the dicussion has run to the end of it natural course and touching it further will likely make it worse not better. so despite any misgivings I might have I think it should probably go forward without any changes to the current text respecting definitions of legally restricted. Fred Baker did the opsdir review, I am pleased to see that we are congruent.
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2015 15:30:43 UTC