On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote: > Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for > > The tricky part is that it takes more words to convey this concept than > the document currently uses. My suggestion would be to replace "legal > demand" with "demand based on a claim of legal violation" in the > abstract, section 1, and the first paragraph of section 3, and replace > all other instances of "legal demand" with "demand." This is a little > clunky but it's the best idea I could come up with. > I would be very hesitant to use "claim of legal violation", because it might be read as agreeing that a violation had occurred. You could alter this further to clarify that this status code is used when returning the relevant resource might result in a violation of laws, but I think that's simply going to make matters worse. I think the current language will be understood in context, and it is better to keep than re-wordsmith now.. Just my two cents, Ted
Received on Monday, 14 December 2015 20:14:28 UTC