Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4412)

Indeed, that would be a great place for it to end up — especially since we've talked about taking these docs to full Standard in the not-absurdly-distant future.

Cheers,


> On 15 Jul 2015, at 3:14 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> On 2015-07-15 14:13, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> I'm reluctant to open the door for wordsmithing the specs for readability in errata; everyone tends to have an opinion, and few actually read the errata, which leads me to believe it's not a good use of WG time.
>> 
>> That said, if you want to make a concrete suggestion, go ahead (before and after).
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> ...
> 
> Shouldn't we collect things like this over here: <https://github.com/httpwg/http11bis/issues>?
> 
> Best regards, Julian

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2015 13:19:06 UTC