Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4412)

On 2015-07-15 14:13, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I'm reluctant to open the door for wordsmithing the specs for readability in errata; everyone tends to have an opinion, and few actually read the errata, which leads me to believe it's not a good use of WG time.
> That said, if you want to make a concrete suggestion, go ahead (before and after).
> Cheers,
> ...

Shouldn't we collect things like this over here: 

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2015 13:14:59 UTC