- From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:20:52 +1000
- To: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 10 July 2015 02:21:21 UTC
On 7 July 2015 at 00:52, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de> wrote: > > > Am 06.07.2015 um 14:23 schrieb Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>: > > > > Yep, that's perfectly (and intentionally) acceptable. If it's not clear > enough, I could add some words. > > > > I think this could be worth mentioning explicitly, just to avoid > misunderstandings/interop problems. > > > βIn my editor's copy [1] I now have the following: "Any compression or decompression context for a GZIPPED_DATA frame is unique to that frame. An endpoint MAY interleave DATA and GZIPPED_DATA frames on a single stream." Will that be enough to remove any potential confusion, do you think? Cheers [1] http://phluid61.github.io/internet-drafts/http2-encoded-data/β -- Matthew Kerwin http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
Received on Friday, 10 July 2015 02:21:21 UTC