- From: Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:51:15 +1300
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 31 March 2015 at 17:08, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > We discussed this document in Dallas: > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tbray-http-legally-restricted-status> > > Based on the feedback received, I believe that we should adopt this document as a WG product, with a target of Proposed Standard. > > Notably, there were no objections in the room to adopting this work, and while there has been some considerable discussion of the scope of this draft on-list in the past, I don’t see any argument that would prevent us from adopting it. > > I've discussed it with our Area Director, who agrees that it's a reasonable thing for us to do. > > I don’t have an indication of how long this work will take; while it’s fairly straightforward technically, some discussion of its semantics are inevitable. In those, I expect to be led by the needs of the parties that actually want to produce and consume those semantics. > > Please comment on-list; we’ll make a decision about adoption at the end of the week. I support adopting it, and don't have any edits to suggest at this time. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcollins@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2015 04:51:43 UTC