- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:46:31 -0500
- To: Brendan Long <self@brendanlong.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
2015-03-27 17:13 GMT-05:00 Brendan Long <self@brendanlong.com>: > hTmftQ6t4pJNuAjYvl8l49hAE7QYpyVi0/bvxnbU27QG9agVq4g53cWouIU+9uKF > H39lF0vJJ8J3DQCXzgRirdaLoXZ+ZJZ0Jtu90FYE38afR763pPEVN02N6w7dgm+k > SI7bSJeep2dG7LzffTg+qzzpJeYJO2KnezE6YOIcDvoHxd80qJCb8zhqQkfSw0AR > OCVIgTG2x7f0i58Ls+/mcGSDnLWg1nZ8PACvuMte7V9B66fWvN9CCM8awcfdZ6w5 I believe that what you want is accomplished by RFC 7240: Prefer: wait=5 The units are perhaps suboptimal for your use case (seconds instead of milliseconds), but we might be able to make a change to support finer grained timing.
Received on Saturday, 28 March 2015 01:46:58 UTC