- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:06:37 +0100
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2015-03-12 02:50, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 12/03/2015 12:25 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: >> This draft contains some last-minute editorial updates that I caught during the shepherd review: >> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info-04.txt >> >> ... and with that, I think we have WG consensus to submit. >> > > The change itself and the changelog entry do not match. How so? > The text is now saying the Proxy-Authorization header is *not* > applicable. When a Proxy-Authoriation may be what actually exists. The text was changed in Section 3, which is about Authentication-Info. Section 4, which is about Proxy-Authentication-Info, was not modified, as I though that the general statement: "The Proxy-Authentication-Info response header field is equivalent to Authentication-Info..." would be sufficient. > The new words need to be "indicated by Authorization or > Proxy-Authorization" or some equivalent. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 08:07:16 UTC