On 12/03/2015 12:25 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: > This draft contains some last-minute editorial updates that I caught during the shepherd review: > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info-04.txt > > ... and with that, I think we have WG consensus to submit. > The change itself and the changelog entry do not match. The text is now saying the Proxy-Authorization header is *not* applicable. When a Proxy-Authoriation may be what actually exists. The new words need to be "indicated by Authorization or Proxy-Authorization" or some equivalent. AmosReceived on Thursday, 12 March 2015 01:51:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:43 UTC