W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: Preliminary agenda for Dallas

From: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:48:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJ_4DfSoGgiLN5TPtFxaCfW=k4GM8B+N5P21Y-f7zRTkuo3icA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
​​On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
wrote:

> --------
> In message <54FECF31.4010207@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes:
>
> >> In other words: The WG is going to totally ignore the substance of
> >> the first competent, comprehensive and thorough outside review
> >> HTTP/2.0 has ever received.
> >
> >The WG is going to follow the IETF process.
> >
> >> Show of hands:  How many think that is the wrong thing to do ?
> >
> >It's the only thing we can do right now short of stopping the process of
> >publishing the HTTP/2 spec.
>
> Considering the severity of the critique, that would be the only
> intellectually defensible thing to do.
>

​That doesn't seem reasonable to me. As mentioned upthread, most of the
details that Bob brought up were discussed thoroughly in the working group.
If he had, say, exposed a critical security flaw then that we be a
reasonable course of action. But if we had to stop the process any time
someone had complaints about a spec, no spec would ever be completed.​
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 14:48:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:43 UTC