On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > -------- > In message <54FECF31.4010207@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: > > >> In other words: The WG is going to totally ignore the substance of > >> the first competent, comprehensive and thorough outside review > >> HTTP/2.0 has ever received. > > > >The WG is going to follow the IETF process. > > > >> Show of hands: How many think that is the wrong thing to do ? > > > >It's the only thing we can do right now short of stopping the process of > >publishing the HTTP/2 spec. > > Considering the severity of the critique, that would be the only > intellectually defensible thing to do. > That doesn't seem reasonable to me. As mentioned upthread, most of the details that Bob brought up were discussed thoroughly in the working group. If he had, say, exposed a critical security flaw then that we be a reasonable course of action. But if we had to stop the process any time someone had complaints about a spec, no spec would ever be completed.Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 14:48:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:43 UTC