- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:56:30 +0100
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2015-03-03 08:01, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 3/03/2015 7:37 p.m., Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 2015-03-03 03:49, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> Julian has disposed of all of the issues raised during WGLC, and >>> there's only one editorial issue left (regarding RFC2119 language). >> >> The ones I added in github. Amos, are you ok with the changes I made? > > In the new text for section 4 copied from RFC7235: > > " > Hence, in such a configuration, it will appear as if > Proxy-Authentication-Info is being forwarded because each proxy will > send the same challenge set. > " > > I'm not sure if "challenge set" is the right words there since this is a > response header and challenge is request detail. > Perhapse "header field-value" instead? > > Overall it looks good to me, even with the above. > > Amos Good catch: <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/b1cfbee4c65805839f32e0477848e1f8791cfcad>
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2015 08:57:20 UTC