- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:47:52 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
* Mark Nottingham wrote: >> On 18 Feb 2015, at 2:38 am, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> I still believe we should actually *fix* the table. > >As we discussed (but for the benefit of everyone else) -- we've already >talked about this extensively, and came to consensus that making such a >change would be more likely to cause problems, without making a material >improvement in the protocol. Do you have a reference for this conclusion? I do not really agree that we should ship a new protocol with known bugs for the short-term benefit of experimental implementations, and I would like to find out what I am missing. I also note that the text Julian quoted needs to be changed re- gardless of whether the table is "fixed". -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de Available for hire in Berlin (early 2015) · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2015 00:48:24 UTC