- From: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 17:41:46 +0100
- To: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
+1 On 02/03/2015 03:18 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2015-02-02 06:59, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> It looks like we won't have anything to discuss regarding HTTP/2 or >> HPACK in Dallas, but we still have a number of active drafts >> (Tunnel-Protocol, Alt-Svc, OppSec and now Auth-Info) along with a >> number of potential work items (tracked at >> <https://github.com/httpwg/wiki/wiki/WatchList>) that we can talk about. >> >> We can, of course, discuss all of this on-list. However, as I >> understand it there are going to be a non-trival number of WG >> participants in Dallas, so it might be good to hold a meeting, if only >> to do some housekeeping and have some face-to-face discussion about >> these drafts. >> >> So, I'm inclined to request a single session in Dallas -- any thoughts? >> ... > > I agree on both: > > - we should try to make progress on-list, in particular on the current > WG drafts (either because it's time, or for Auth-Info, because it's > supposed to be a quick thing) > > - for those WG members who do attend Dallas, it's certainly a good idea > to have a time slot for WG discussions > > Best regards, Julian > > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2015 16:42:17 UTC