Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4252)

Likewise, I think this is correct. Thanks, Bjoern.


> On 2 Feb 2015, at 12:52 pm, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7230,
> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7230&eid=4252
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Bjoern Hoehrmann <bjoern@hoehrmann.de>
> 
> Section: 2.7.2.
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>     https-URI = "https:" "//" authority path-abempty [ "?" query ]
>                 [ "#" fragment ]
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>     https-URI = "https:" "//" authority path-abempty [ "?" query ]
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> See erratum 4251 on the same document.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7230 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-26)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing
> Publication Date    : June 2014
> Author(s)           : R. Fielding, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Monday, 2 February 2015 02:31:25 UTC