Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4251)

As discussed on list, this seems to be correct.

Bjoern, will you file one for HTTPS too?

Cheers,


> On 1 Feb 2015, at 10:36 pm, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7230,
> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7230&eid=4251
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Bjoern Hoehrmann <bjoern@hoehrmann.de>
> 
> Section: 2.7.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>     http-URI = "http:" "//" authority path-abempty [ "?" query ]
>                [ "#" fragment ]
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>     http-URI = "http:" "//" authority path-abempty [ "?" query ]
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Per http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-4.3 "URI scheme specifications must define their own syntax so that all strings matching their scheme-specific syntax will also match the <absolute-URI> grammar." See the discussion around http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/gZVRtgOUFyzOk68FgL1jHTzWG2s
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7230 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-26)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing
> Publication Date    : June 2014
> Author(s)           : R. Fielding, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Monday, 2 February 2015 01:02:25 UTC