- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 18:23:26 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: HTTP <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2015-02-01 10:00, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Julian has proposed that >> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reschke-httpauth-auth-info-00> be >> adopted by this WG, with the aim of getting to LC quickly so that it can >> be referenced by other efforts. > > There is basically no information in the draft what the header can, > should, or should not be used for, it does not even indicate what the > `Digest` scheme uses it for, and it does not point out caveats like The latter is supposed to be in the DIGEST spec. Do you have a proposal for the former? > poor interaction with pipelined requests as they are noted in RFC 2617 > and whether such considerations apply to HTTP/2, for instance. I guess Again, that seems to be specific to the nextnonce parameter which is specific to DIGEST. > that can be addressed, but it would not have hurt to let the `-00` draft > go through a round of feedback before calling for adoption. Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2015 17:24:10 UTC