Re: New tunnel protocol

so is the plan to identify the next protocol as "TLS" and use ALPN 
within the TLS handshake to identify the next layer after that?  It 
would be great to re-use the identifiers, but it's not at all clear from 
the draft.

Regards

Adrien

------ Original Message ------
From: "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>; "HTTP Working Group" 
<ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 22/01/2015 11:05:44 a.m.
Subject: Re: New tunnel protocol

>On 21 January 2015 at 14:01, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote:
>>  one comment on this. It seems this header is intended to be used only 
>>when
>>  the next protocol is actually TLS, and the one after that is the one 
>>that is
>>  identified by this header.
>
>We've used ALPN to describe non-TLS protocols already: h2c.
>
>This is definitely usable outside of TLS.

Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 22:09:36 UTC