Re: New tunnel protocol

On 20 January 2015 at 21:25, Amos Jeffries <> wrote:
> In section 2.2 there are a "must not" and three "must" wordings. These
> all need to be normative to make any sense.

Done.  And thanks.

On 20 January 2015 at 20:59, Mark Nottingham <> wrote:
> I notice that we don't have any open issues for this document. Pending Martin's formatting changes, I'd like to start thinking about WGLC for this document.

Sounds like a plan.  Do you want to see a new revision?

Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 17:18:47 UTC