On 20 January 2015 at 21:25, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > In section 2.2 there are a "must not" and three "must" wordings. These > all need to be normative to make any sense. Done. And thanks. On 20 January 2015 at 20:59, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > I notice that we don't have any open issues for this document. Pending Martin's formatting changes, I'd like to start thinking about WGLC for this document. Sounds like a plan. Do you want to see a new revision?Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 17:18:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:42 UTC