- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:25:40 +1300
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 21/01/2015 5:59 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: > Thanks, Martin. > > I notice that we don't have any open issues for this document. > Pending Martin's formatting changes, I'd like to start thinking > about WGLC for this document. > In section 2.2 there are a "must not" and three "must" wordings. These all need to be normative to make any sense. Otherwie, LGTM. Amos -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUvzhUAAoJELJo5wb/XPRj3psIAIWOcPg9229AS+/1Y6wAw7Bn lisGZgMAPgXSU/aZdyvlgy6q1xpeJQMnDuWRBnaUByVjP5y2J8g1dTK6gotdEC5R tY2Y/eoXxFUnvz/jTac4d1tMt4pwlSp8IhJK2IKrsVfQpfxoDzetMlm7X7m4MoBD jml4AGyzvIh37p34Zxv+Z7KHwNi0saT9WZAxEjLcvKOj1Ivqa85PJDvVIndx1w+F llwh6TRneDX5SUuUuVhsVFqr0b0HuzSW9VhDnij/eFxP4wqEq9ixaO3OOaByKdZb lYg4tQ0Gg2nq3xPtYjk4RUOegJydRHdKUfduKWVE9nzPvjKYzSwaMY24pqEJt2s= =SQbA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 05:26:24 UTC